Hitting the media contacts again wouldn’t hurt, either.
PERSONAL AND CONFIDENTIAL, PLEASE FORWARD IMMEDIATELY TO US ATTORNEY CARMEN ORTIZ, HEAD OF MASSACHUSETTS DIVISIONDear US Attorney Carmen Ortiz,This is to inform you that Mr. Rudolph Giuliani, former mayor of New
York City, will be in Worcester this Wed. November 5th, at the Hanover
Theater. Please see below a link describing his appearance.
http://thehanovertheatre.org/showinfo.php?id=62As you know, immediately after September 11, 2001, Mr. Giuliani ,in
his capacity as mayor of NYC, did remove and destroy 99.5% of the
steel evidence from the building destruction at Ground Zero, according
to CUNY Fire Science Professor Glenn Corbett. As you also know,
destruction of evidence at a crime scene is a violation of 18 U.S.C. §
1519, which states that whosoever “alters, destroys, mutilates,
conceals, covers up, [or] falsifies” any “tangible object with the
intent to impede, obstruct, or influence” a criminal investigation,
“shall be fined under this title, imprisoned not more than 20 years,
or both.”Therefore you have strong probable cause to either initiate an
investigation, or to present the evidence in the sample indictment
below to a Special Grand Jury in Massachusetts, as required by 8 USC §
3332 which states that:“Any such attorney receiving information concerning such an alleged
offense from any other person shall, if requested by such other
person, inform the grand jury of such alleged offense, the identity of
such other person, and such attorney’s action or recommendation.”The US Attorney for the District of Massachusetts, having been duly
informed, is requested to present above evidence to a Special Grand
Jury, by the below signed citizens of the Commonwealth.Please convene a Special Grand Jury immediately and, upon return of an
indictment, do your duty to issue an arrest warrant for Mr. Giuliani,
which may be expeditiously executed on Wednesday night when Mr.
Giuliani will be in our fair city of Worcester. Of course, as is true
with all Americans, Mr. Giuliani must be read his rights and is
presumed innocent unless found guilty.Sincerely,Ralph Lopez
153 Auburn St.
Cambridge, MA
Citizen, Taxpayer, and Registered Voter—————————-
SAMPLE INDICTMENT FOR MR. RUDOLPH GIULIANI
______________________________________UNITED STATES OF AMERICA- v. -RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANIdefendant
____________________________________
GENERAL ALLEGATIONS
1. RUDOLPH WILLIAM LOUIS GIULIANI (HENCEFORTH “RUDOLPH GIULIANI”)
served as Mayor of New York City from January 1994 through December
2001.
2. The People of the United States of America were attacked on
September 11, 2001, in New York City and in Washington DC, resulting
in thousands of deaths of American citizens and other nationals.
3. These attacks resulted in the unprecedented complete and
catastrophic destruction of three major high-rise buildings, World
Trade Center One, World Trade Center Two, and World Trade Center
Seven. These steel-framed skyscrapers have been the only such
structures in history to collapse in seconds by means other than
controlled demolition.
4. The primary forensic evidence and physical record of the
destruction of a structure whose main support is its steel frame is
the remainders of the steel frame, including all bracketing
assemblies, gusset plates, trusses and both vertical beams and cross
pieces. The national standard recognized by the US Department of
Justice in the investigation of arson-related crimes is the National
Fire Protection Association Document 921, “Guide for Fire and
Explosion Investigations” (“NFPA 921.”) The NFPA 921 states at section
14.3, under “Preservation of the Fire Scene and Physical Evidence,”
that “the entire fire scene should be considered physical evidence and
should be protected and preserved” (“NFPA 921 Guide for Fire and
Explosion Investigations,” 2001 edition.) In the event that evidence
must be moved, section 16.5.2.1 states “Physical evidence should be
thoroughly documented before it is moved…The investigator should
strive to maintain a list of all evidence removed and of who removed
it.”
5. Furthermore, in a criminal case, NFPA 921 16.11.2 requires “that
the evidence be kept until the case is adjudicated.”
OVERT ACTS
6. On or about September 15, 2001, RUDOPH GIULIANI, acting on his
authority as duly elected Mayor of the City of New York, authorized
and contracted Bovis Lend Lease, AMEC Construction Management, Tully
Construction Company, and Turner Construction Company to “provide the
work necessary for removal and demolition services,” according to
letter contracts, in order to remove the forensic evidence from the
World Trade Center (henceforth “Ground Zero”) from the scene of the
attacks, and shipping it outside of police custody to scrap metal
companies in New York and New Jersey, including Metal Management
Northeast and Hugo Neu Schnitzer, both of New Jersey, and from there
was shipped outside of US jurisdiction to Baosteel Group in China.
7. The above facts in paragraph number 6 have been established by
discovery in US District Court, Southern District of New York, Judge
Alvin Hellerstein presiding. Judge Hellerstein determined that: “The
City also engaged private contractors for the recovery effort. On
September 15, 2001, FEMA confirmed that contracts could be awarded
without need for competitive bidding under the emergency conditions
existing after September 11. (Pls.’ J.A. Vol. 4, Ex. 53.) Requirements
for competitive bidding having been waived, and pursuant to the
Declarations of Emergency issued at the City, State and Federal
levels, the DDC engaged Bovis Lend Lease, AMEC Construction
Management, Tully Construction Company, and Turner Construction
Company to “provide the work necessary for removal and demolition
services.”
The “DDC” is the City of New York Department of Design and
Construction, the contracting authority acting under the Mayor.
8. Once outside US custody, the steel members comprising 99.5 percent
of the structural steel of the Twin Towers and Building Seven, was
destroyed by melting and rendered useless for any further forensic
examination.
9. Throughout the months-long process of evidence removal, prominent
members of the Fire Science community repeatedly objected, in public
and in private, that valuable evidence was being forever lost for
further investigation, especially given the unprecedented nature of
the structural failure of the three buildings. On January 1, 2002,
Bill Manning, editor-in-chief if Fire Engineering Magazine, wrote in a
column:
“For more than three months, structural steel from the World Trade
Center has been and continues to be cut up and sold for scrap. Crucial
evidence that could answer many questions about high-rise building
design practices and performance under fire conditions is on the slow
boat to China…” Dr. Frederick W. Mowrer, associate professor in the
Fire Protection Engineering Department at the University of Maryland,
told the New York Times on December 25, 2001: “I find the speed with
which potentially important evidence has been removed and recycled to
be appalling.”
Glenn Corbett, a science professor at John Jay College, told a US
congressional committee on march 6, 2002, that the “lack of
significant amounts of steel for examination will make it difficult,
if not impossible, to make a definitive statement as to the cause and
chronology of the collapse.”
10. Nevertheless, RUDOLPH GIULIANI continued the removal of the
evidence, knowing, as a former federal prosecutor, absolutely and
without a doubt that all of it was rapidly being destroyed, and that
such destruction of evidence at an arson scene was a crime.
COUNT ONE
Spoliation of evidence at the scene of a crime of arson.
11. RUDOLPH GIULIANI, by ordering the removal of 99.5 percent of key
evidence of arson from Ground Zero and sending it to certain
destruction, willfully and knowingly engaged in felony destruction of
evidence under 18 U.S.C. § 1519, which states that whosoever “alters,
destroys, mutilates, conceals, covers up, [or] falsifies” any
“tangible object with the intent to impede, obstruct, or influence” a
criminal investigation, “shall be fined under this title, imprisoned
not more than 20 years, or both.”
12. RUDOLPH GIULIANI, by ordering the removal of 99.5 percent of key
evidence of arson from Ground Zero and sending it to certain
destruction, willfully and knowingly engaged in felony destruction of
evidence under relevant statutes of the State of New York, which
regards the destruction of evidence in any capital crime to be a
felony.
13. RUDOLPH GIULIANI, by ordering the removal of 99.5 percent of key
evidence of arson from Ground Zero and sending it to certain
destruction, willfully and knowingly engaged in felony destruction of
evidence under relevant statutes of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts,
which regards the destruction of evidence in any capital crime to be a
felony.
JURISDICTION
14. Violations of federal law are subject to the jurisdiction of the
US Attorney for the US Department of Justice, District of
Massachusetts, Carmen Ortiz.
15. Local jurisdiction is established by common law for capital cases
and Jenkins v. Chief Justice of The District Court, 416 Mass. 221
[1993]: An officer in his own jurisdiction may make an arrest without
a warrant for a felony if the officer has probable cause to believe
the person to be arrested committed or is committing a felony. An
officer may also, without a warrant, arrest for a misdemeanor which
constitutes a breach of the peace, or for a misdemeanor where
warrantless arrest is allowed by statute. Whenever police effect a
warrantless arrest of a subject, it must be followed by a judicial
determination of probable cause within twenty-four hours of the
arrest, including weekends and holidays, based on explicit oath or
affirmation of the arresting officer, or based on the officers police
report. (Jenkins v. Chief Justice of The District Court, 416 Mass. 221
[1993]).
REQUIREMENT FOR U.S. ATTORNEY TO PRESENT EVIDENCE TO GRAND JURY
16. 18 USC § 3332 states that “Any such attorney receiving
information concerning such an alleged offense from any other person
shall, if requested by such other person, inform the grand jury of
such alleged offense, the identity of such other person, and such
attorney’s action or recommendation.” The US Attorney for the District
of Massachusetts, having been duly informed, is requested to present
above evidence to a Special Grand Jury.
MISPRISION OF A FELONY
17. 18 U.S.C. §4 states that: “Whoever, having knowledge of the
actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United
States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same
to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the
United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more
than three years, or both.”
DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS, NOVEMBER 2, 2013
——————————————
——————————————–
RELATED ARTICLE IN DIGITAL JOURNAL:
“The case against Rudy Giuliani for evidence destruction on 9/11”
http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/361304
“It has always been my bias to arrest some small fry first. It is asking American cops a lot to go to the home of, say, Rumsfeld, or any Pentagon-connected person. They can instead go for a lowly reporter at the New York Times — or the Concord (NH) Monitor for that matter! Such persons have committed the crime of obstruction of justice, which is a federal felony, and may be a felony in most states.
It isn’t even necessary for the person to be charged with a crime. In the US there has been a Material Witness law since the days of George Washington. It enables the arrest and detention of anyone who has important information.
18 USC 3144: “If it appears from an affidavit filed by a party that the testimony of a person is material in a criminal proceeding, and if it is shown that it may become impracticable to secure the presence of the person by subpoena, a judicial officer may order the arrest of the person.” ”
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=27659
Much more about Rudy Giuliani’s connections to 9-11 crimes and cover-up reported by Kevin Ryan: https://digwithin.net/2016/11/26/giuliani/